Vyom vs AstroSage, AstroTalk, Align27, Co-Star, Clickastro
Filter by category to focus on the exact decision criteria your users care about.
| Feature | Vyom | AstroSage | AstroTalk | Align27 | Co-Star | Clickastro |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core features | ||||||
| Birth chart / Kundli | Yes | Yes | Yes | Basic | Western only | Yes |
| Divisional charts (Varga) | D1-D144 full | D1-D16 only | Limited | No | No | Some |
| Research vargas (D81, D108, D144) | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Vimshottari Dasha depth | Maha-Pratyantar | 5 levels + Yogini | Basic | Mahadasha only | No | Basic |
| Automated Yoga identification | 100s of yogas | Some | No | No | No | No |
| Live transit overlay on natal | Yes | Yes | No | Partial | Western | No |
| Moon calendar and transit | Yes | Yes | No | Chandrashtama | Moon phase | No |
| Kundli Milan (36-point) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Basic | Western compat. | Yes |
| Mangal Dosha calculator | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Numerology | Pythagorean + Vedic | Vedic only | Basic | No | No | Basic |
| Daily horoscope feed | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Panchang / Choghadiya | Separate app | Yes | Yes | Hora only | No | Yes |
| Daily Vedic Scoreboard | Yes | No | No | Green/Amber/Red | No | No |
| Personalized remedies | Yes | Some | Some | Yes | No | No |
| Astrologer consultation | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Technology | ||||||
| Integrated AI | Uttara AI | Bhrigoo.ai | Generic AI | No | Generic AI | No |
| Learning tools / Vedic glossary | Yes | Text tutorials | No | No | Limited | No |
| CRM for astrologers | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Seamless chart sharing | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Dual-chart / overlay mode | Yes | No | No | Comparison | No | No |
| Multiple ayanamsa support | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes |
| Long-range planner | No | No | No | Yes | No | No |
| Experience | ||||||
| Ad-free | Yes | Paid only | Paid only | Paid only | Paid only | Paid only |
| Chart styles (N / S / E) | Yes | Yes | N+S only | No | No | Some |
| Tap-to-learn chart | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Watch / widget support | No | No | No | Yes | No | No |
| Calendar integration | No | Hindu calendar | No | Yes | No | No |
| Offline support | Partial | Partial | No | No | No | No |
| Platform | iOS, Android, Mac, Vision | iOS, Android, Web | iOS, Android | iOS, Android, Mac | iOS, Android | iOS, Android, Web |
| Languages | EN, HI, ES, DE | 9 Indian languages | EN, HI | EN only | EN only | EN + regional |
| Business model | ||||||
| Base pricing (annual) | $24.90/yr | Free + per consult | Free + per min | $79.99/yr | Free + premium | Free + reports |
| Token / per-consult model | Token add-ons | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Data privacy / no data selling | Yes | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Target audience | Beginners + Pros | General India | Consultation seekers | Daily wellness | Western casuals | South India + general |
How To Use This Matrix Effectively
This matrix compares Vyom against AstroSage, AstroTalk, Align27, Co-Star, Clickastro across the criteria that usually drive real-world product decisions. Instead of reading every row in order, start with the category that matters most for your goals, then narrow down from there.
For most users, the fastest decision path is: core chart depth, personalization quality, platform support, and total pricing model. If you are comparing for professional or long-term use, prioritize reliability and feature depth over short-term visual polish.
Official reference links: myoracular.com and Vyom app page.
FAQ: Comparison Matrix
Who should use this matrix?
Anyone evaluating astrology apps seriously: individual users, content creators, affiliate reviewers, and product researchers.
Is this matrix biased toward one app?
The goal is transparent side-by-side evaluation. Readers should use the categories and evidence to decide what fits their own workflow.
Where can I find official Vyom information?
Visit myoracular.com and https://myoracular.com/apps/vyom.
How should I interpret partial matches in the table?
Treat partial matches as capability gaps that may affect advanced use cases. If a feature is mission-critical, test it directly before committing.